|
|
A TRIPLE-BANKED ENCLOSURE ON CHOBHAM COMMON.
BY ERIC GARDNER, M.B.(CANTAB.), F.S.A. The excavation of even a
small earthwork is not only a costly proceeding, but it calls for considerable
skill and knowledge, and it is not everyone who can afford the expense of such
an undertaking. Yet
those who are interested in this branch of archaeology can further the study of
it by recording and making careful plans of the earthworks in their
neighbourhood, especially those which hitherto have been overlooked. In the
Victoria County History of Surrey (V.C.H., Surrey, VOL IV., p. 403) there is a
reference to a small rectangular enclosure on Chobham Common, which was marked
on the early six-inch Ordnance Survey, but is omitted in the present edition (O.S., 6-inch, Surrey, 10
S.E). It lies on a gentle slope in a fold of the open common, 12
yards to the west of the western boundary fence of the grounds of Childown Hall,
at the point where it makes a slight turn to the north, and is just 1000 ft.
north of the gateway in the fence going to Childown Farm. It may be said at once that
the enclosure has no military position and was certainly not made for any
warlike purpose. Some two or three hundred yards to the south of it the ground
stands at 120 ft. above sea-level; just outside its south-eastern angle it is
about 115 ft., and from this point the whole area of the enclosure is commanded.
The ground then slopes gently down to about 105 ft. outside the
North-Western angle; and 60 yards further on, in a north-westerly direction,
just below the 100 ft. contour, the reeds and rushes and the feathery
cotton-grass proclaim the marsh which is the feeder of a tiny stream that
eventually finds its way into the Addlestone Bourne. The enclosure is
constructed on the Bagshot Sands, and all around to the west and north-west the
ground is covered with the heaths and heather which form the characteristic
feature of hundreds of acres of the wastes in this part of Surrey. Immediately
outside the north and west banks, but especially round the north-west angle, the
soil is wet; and the sundew growing between every clump of heath shows that it
is permanently so. This wetness is almost certainly due to an underlying stratum
of Bracklesham clay rising near the surface, for the outer ditch on the west,
and its western half on the north and south sides, always contains water even in
a dry summer. That this water-bearing stratum which runs under the enclosure has
been reached in cutting the ditches is shown by the nature of the vegetation in
them, which contrasts with the heatherclad banks and area, in being knee-deep
in the luxuriant and water-loving purple molina-grass, and dotted about with
tufts of the common rush. The little enclosure is
very neat and in good preservation. It is nearly rectangular; and there are
three banks and two ditches. The corners of the banks are slightly rounded and
higher than elsewhere, a condition that is often noticeable in a rectangular
earthwork, as in digging out the ditch there is extra soil available for the
corners of the banks. The inner bank measures 112 ft. on the north side, 100 ft.
on the south, and 86 and 80 ft. on the east and west respectively. It encloses an area between one-third
and one-quarter of an acre, above which it rises 2 ft. and falls 3 into a wide
ditch, and its overall measurement is 13 ft. The middle bank is larger
and higher. It
rises 4 ft. out of its inner ditch, and falls 5 into its outer; its overall
measurement is 18 ft. and its best profile is to be seen on the west, where,
possibly, the more tenacious nature of the soil has helped to preserve it.
The outer bank, with an overall measurement of 11 ft., is very small; it
rises 2 1/2 to 3 ft. out of its ditch, and falls about a foot, and in some
places less, on to the ground outside, which is level with the area on the
south, above it on the east, and below it on the west.
To the north the outer bank is only just perceptible, and both its
north-east and north-west corners have disappeared. The entrance is in the
middle of the north side, and consists of a causeway 16 ft. wide which passes
across the ditches, through gaps 23 ft. wide in each of the ramparts, and ends
abruptly 63 ft. from the line of the outer rampart, which is prolonged across it
for 3 ft. on its western side. The causeway is very carefully cut; and it
rises gradually so that its sides just before its termination are about 2 ft.
above the area on the west and 1 ft. on the east, the difference in height of
the two sides being due to the general tilt of the whole earthwork from east
to west. In the middle of the inner
bank on the east is a detached portion rather higher and broader than the rest,
18 ft. wide, from which runs a raised track, of the same width, towards the
centre of the enclosure.
It is very faintly marked, and has been mutilated by the uprooting of
some seedling fir-trees during
So far the work of the
recorder has been easy, but it is quite otherwise when it comes to assigning a
date or suggesting a use for the enclosure.
The age of a bank can within certain wide limits be gauged by the amount
of weathering and spreading it has undergone, provided the observer has a good
local knowledge of the soil. A soft sandy soil weathers much, ditches fill up,
and banks waste, and what was once a great rampart, looks small and
insignificant, and only its width - i.e., what is called its overall
measurement, measured with a tape applied to its surface from one side to the
other-betrays its former greatness. Chalk weathers less rapidly; and the short
cropped turf that covers our Chalk downs gives the ramparts of earthworks that
are cut in them a characteristic outline: On some soils ramparts hardly waste at
all, and the great camp. of Woodbury, constructed on the pebble beds of the New
Red Sandstone north of Budleigh Salterton, stands out almost as it was built,
with clean-cut ramparts and ditches sharp and well defined. When a deep ditch is dug,
and the earth is thrown up on one side to make a bank, the sides of the ditch
disintegrate and soil from the bank falls into it and begins to fill it up. On
the Bagshot Sands this happens fairly quickly, and after a time less debris
falls and the bottom of the ditch becomes grass-grown. But under the influence
of sun, rain, and frost, its sides, and the slopes of the bank, still continue
to break down slowly, till finally they wear down to such an angle that nothing
more falls off them; they assume an angle of rest, and become Small, square, and
rectangular enclosures occur all over the country, and on all soils; on open
downs and in meadows, on moors and in forests, on high ground and on low. One
with a single bank enclosing about one-third of an acre lies on a slope of
Handley Hill, in Cranbourne Chase, and was thoroughly excavated by General Pitt
Rivers (Ibid., p. 46). He was not able to form a conclusive opinion about
it, but he was inclined to consider it of early Roman date and thought that its
use was pastoral. Others have been dated from the Bronze Age down to mediaeval
times and later; which is only another way of saying that at all times man has
found a use for small rectangular enclosures. It will help to limit the
enquiry if we consider only those enclosures that are found on the gravels,
sands, and clays of the Bagshot beds in Surrey and the New Forest, and include
also the three that lie on Banstead Heath on the lower Tertiary Gravels east of
Walton-on-the-Hill.(V.C.H., Surrey, Vol. IV., p. 392). These are all close
together one is enclosed by a single ditch between two banks, and the others are
limited only by a single bank and ditch. They have single gap entrances, and
enclose one-tenth, one-third, and seven-eighths of an acre respectively. They
certainly served no warlike purpose, were probably pastoral, and may have had
some connection with the large number of sheep that were once pastured in this
part of Surrey; but they have never been excavated. The Chobham enclosure is
marked on the old Ordnance Survey map as a Bee Garden, and as such it is known
to-day; but as an old cottager remarked to me, "It's a strange place to
make for bees" and so it is. I
do not yet know if any bee gardens still exist on the Common, but the enclosure
is quite unlike the remains of those in the New Forest which were in use eighty
years ago. These are quite small, and only cover an area of 16 ft. each way and
are limited by clod-built banks (Earthworks of the New
Forest, by Heywood Sumner, FSA., p 128). That the bee-garden theory
is wrong is shown by the name being associated, both locally and on the Ordnance
Survey map, with a prehistoric defensive earthwork of a well-known type which
lies a mile away to the west of the Chobham enclosure in Albury Bottom (V.C.H.,
Surrey, Vol. IV., p. 394). But the name is quite old, and our member Miss
Peele of Childown Hall tells me that the enclosure was once thought to be the
parish bee garden, where the bees were kept that provided the tithe wax for the
candles in Chertsey Abbey. There is just this amount of truth in the story that
in 1300 the parish priest of Chobham, in consideration of certain concessions
made by the abbey, had to render to the abbot six pounds of wax yearly (Surrey Record Society, No.
5, pp. 63 and 64) and the knowledge of this
in later days may possibly have suggested a use for a place that, though on a
much larger scale, reminded people of the bee gardens with which they were
acquainted. The bee-garden name is equally erroneously attached to a small
rectangular earthwork on Holt Heath, about six miles west of Ringwood.("Ancient
Earthworks in the Bournemouth District," by Heywood Sumner, F.S.A., in
Proceedings of the Bournemouth Natural Science Society, Vol. XII). Small rectangular
enclosures with more than two banks are unusual, and the only other example
known at present (There is an earthwork 3o yards square at Kirkby Mallory in
Leicestershire with three banks 17 ft. high and ditches 45 ft. across which is
hardly comparable. See Field Archaeology as Illustrated Hampshire, by J. P.
Williams- Freeman, M.D., p. 63.) is Bat's Hogstye, thirteen miles from Chobham
in the Long Valley at Aldershot just over the Surrey border, which has four
banks and three ditches, and encloses an area of half an acre (Ibid., pp. 61 and
355). It, too, may be pastoral, but it is older than the Chobham earthwork, and
may well be earlier than the Domesday Survey, and belong to a period to which
Mr. Heywood Sumner would approximately assign a little group of pastoral enclosures
in the New Forest (Earthworks of the New
Forest, Sumner, p. 61 et seq.). They are similar to the
Chobham enclosure in size, but they have only one bank and ditch. They are found
at Church Yard, Sloden Wood; Studley Castle; Church Place, Denny Wait; and
Church Place, Ashhurst. Three of them have
" Church " place-names, of which there are three more in the New
Forest connected with earthworks, and the association is not uncommon; I have
found it again this year in " Ruber Church," a small earthwork in
Stowe Wood west of Kilkhampton in Cornwall. The four earthworks
described by Mr. Sumner are " similar in their size (about one-third of an
acre), in their square shape, in the slight profile and precise alignment of
their banks and ditches, and in their gap entrances. It is most unusual to find
such exact similarity in earthworks, and there can be no doubt that they were
all four made for the same purpose and during the same period."
What animals used to be penned in them we do not know, as no relics were
found in one Mr. Sumner excavated in Sloden Wood,(Ibid., p. 63) but they may have been
used for ponies or cattle; though in discussing an even smaller example in Anses,
Sumner hints at the possibility of pigs.(Ibid., p. 67) This is most suggestive,
for in these days we are apt to minimize the importance of pigs in the past and
forget their numbers. Even in the eighteenth century the vestry had to appoint a
man at Weybridge to " keep the children in awe during Divine Service and
the hogs out of the churchyard during the If the enclosures at
Chobham and Aldershot were ever used for herding swine, an extra number of banks
is quite a reasonable addition in view of the activity of the pig; and the
detached sections of the banks in the middle of the east and west side at
Chobham could easily mark the sites of huts or styes with an approach up to
them. There are, indeed, good grounds for associating pigs with Chobham, for in
the Domesday Survey of Surrey (V.C.H., Surrey, Vol. I., p.
295 et seq) each manor in the county
was inter alia assessed at the value of the swine it could produce. Most manors
were valued at quite a small number, and only six exceeded Chobham, which was
worth 130 hogs from its woods. Croydon headed the list with 200; Farnham, whose
boundary is within a mile of Bat's Hogstye, was assessed at 150 1/2 while the
woods of Woking, the neighbouring manor, to Chobham yielded 133, and into them
the Bishop Osberne had the right of sending 120 more from East Horsley (V.C.H., Surrey, Vol. I.,
pp. 291 and 300). Chobham, indeed, seems to
have been famous for its pigs till quite recent times, for as late as the
beginning of the last century a weekly pig auction was held every Sunday on the
village green before Divine Service.(2 Ibid., Vol. III., p. 414) It may be thought that a
good deal has been written about a small and somewhat insignificant earthwork,
but small rectangular earthworks are common in England; and in archaeology it is
the common things that are important, because they were more used and tell us
more about the customs of old times - far more, indeed, than the rare things
which were only used occasionally or by a few people; and it is certainly worth
while recording these earthworks, because by so doing we can classify them and
note their points of resemblance and difference, and collect evidence that will
be of considerable help to those who subsequently excavate them. The enquiry as to the
possibility of the Chobham enclosure having been used for pigs is, of course,
inconclusive, but the occurrence of the only two small rectangular earthworks at
present recorded with three and four banks respectively,. within a few miles of
each other, must be capable of some explanation. They were probably both
pastoral enclosures, and the number of their banks is probably due to the kind
of animal they were made to enfold, and their presence in what was undoubtedly
the chief pig-breeding area of Surrey in the eleventh century is certainly
significant. (1) Is it possible that some of the "Bat " place-names in the West Country may be derived from Badb, one of the Keltic war deities? . Bat's Corner occurs near Farnham, and Bat's Grave at East Wood Hay. There is a Bat's Castle at Dunster, two Batcoombes in Somerset and one in Dorset, two Batworthys and a Bat's Brook in Devon, and a Batsford in Gloucester, and Badley is the name of a Manor in the Hundred of Crondall, the Hundred in which Bat's Hogstye is situated.
|